Closer to whom?
Boundary: Public aggregate planning scenarios - not confirmed anti-HER2 services, observed capacity, operational feasibility, clinical guidance, or a policy recommendation.
This free static site serves nine precomputed, hash-receipted reports. No patient records, individual locations, raw source payloads, live APIs, or paid compute are used.
Candidate-network comparison
| Configuration | Sites | Mean minutes | P95 minutes | Within 60 min |
|---|
Normative viewpoints
Clinical eligibility and safety are hard gates and are never traded off here.
Decision uncertainty
Uncertainty and provenance
Spatial, temporal-demand, vehicle-rate, and normative-weight uncertainty remain separate. Probabilistic clinical intervals and monetary ENBS are not estimated without source-backed distributions.
Source revision: 5fb940e8f14782422aee32601b99160b4374492e. National analysis workflow: 30243407303. Download the deterministic aggregate report bundle.
Additional reviewed outputs
- Distributional equity: aggregate access summaries by deprivation, rurality, vehicle access, and overlapping ethnicity total-response groups; ecological only, with unknowns retained.
- Capacity and cost: implied aggregate course envelopes and private-vehicle resource costs; observed staffing, capacity, treatment cost, and omitted components are not estimated.
- Resilience: hypothetical single-candidate-site routing sensitivity; this is not an observed outage or resilience guarantee.
- Optimisation comparison: exact p-median, p-centre, and 60-minute maximal-coverage results for p=1,3,5 only; larger configurations remain heuristic.